Tag: rule changes

AP Photo

Friday’s most important rule changes only matter if refs actually enforce them

AP Photo

On Friday, the NCAA Men’s Basketball Rules Committee announced that they had approved a package of proposals designed to improve college basketball, proposals that will become rules if they are approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel on a conference call on June 8th.

Many of the proposed rule changes are designed to improve the watchability of the college game. The charge circle will be pushed out a foot to four feet, making it more difficult for weak-side defenders to draw offensive fouls. The number of timeouts that college coaches have at their disposal will be reduced from five to four, and any coach’s timeout that occurs within 30 seconds of a scheduled TV timeout will be used as the TV timeout. There will also be limits on just how long reviews can last, and referees will be able to punish floppers if they review a potential flagrant foul and determine that no contact was made.

The most notable change, however, will be the reduction of the shot clock from 35 seconds to 30 seconds. It’s a logical and necessary change for no other reason than it simply does not make sense to have men’s college basketball be the lone outlier. The NBA and FIBA use 24-second shot clocks. Women’s basketball uses a 30-second clock. The only high-level basketball league in the world that uses a 35-second clock is men’s college basketball.

Think about it like this: If we were starting the sport of men’s college basketball from scratch today and I proposed that we used a 35-second clock just to be different, no one would take me seriously. I’d probably get laughed at because everyone would assume such an asinine idea had to be a joke and thrown out of the room when they realized that I was, in fact, being serious.

The bottom line is that the only reason a team used all 35 seconds on the shot clock was because that was their game-plan. All this reduction will do is take away five seconds of false motion or five seconds of a point guard dribbling out the shot clock for the teams that want to slow the pace.

And even then, it’s hard to imagine this reduction really changing the college game all that much, particularly in the short-term.

The same can be said for the other proposed rule changes I mentioned earlier.

Moving the charge circle out a foot will make offensive players more likely to attack the rim. One NBA scout told me this season that he got frustrated scouting college games because the guys he was watching were afraid to attack the rim. It was too easy to draw a charge, so he couldn’t get a feel for how the kids he was scouting could finish when they were challenged by a shot blocker. Watching dunks in traffic and defenders block potential posters is as entertaining as any moment in sports, and maybe this rule helps make that happen more often.

But how often are we really going to see a poster? Maybe once per game, if that? Maybe 20 more vines go viral during the 2015-16 season, but mostly, this rule will just reduce the amount of bitching and moaning I do about awful charge calls.

The rule changes about timeouts and reviews will also help with the pace of play, especially at the end of games, but fans are already tuning into end-of-game situations regardless of how quickly or slowly they happen.

And those end up being, what, the final five or ten minutes of a broadcast?

If we really want to improve the sport, if we really want to get casual fans interested in more than just the NCAA tournament and the chance to see a buzzer-beater at the end of a Big Monday game, the emphasis needs to be on bringing back the freedom of movement rules that were put into place in the 2013-14 season.

“The increase in the physicality of play has been a major concern for coaches,” Georgia State head coach Ron Hunter, the president of the NABC, said. “The NCAA rules committee has addressed that this week with an emphasis on perimeter defense and post play.”

Kansas head coach Bill Self agreed.

“I do think the biggest thing that needed to be done was to clean up the game to basically call the game that the rules were intended for it to be called,” he told the Topeka Capital-Journal. “And it’s not officials’ fault. It’s a combination of officials, coaches, everything, because coaches get by with as much as they can get by with.”

Self is right.

The changes that were made at the start of the 2013-14 season lasted into conference play, but not much further than that. Eventually, the combination of coaches complaining, fan pushback and referees getting tired of blowing a whistle on every possession more or less nullified those rule changes. In simpler terms, the coaches told their players to keep playing the way they were playing because the refs simply would not call every single foul.

There’s a simple way to solve that problem, a simple way to change the way that the college game is played: Call those fouls.

Every. Single. One.

Every hand check, every hold, every cutter that’s “bumped” with a forearm shiver to the collarbone, every defender that tries to take a charge by sliding under an offensive player that’s already in the air.

The rules need to change the way that coaches teach defense, and the only way to do that is by making it impossible to win the old way.


Burning Questions: If you could change one on-court rule in college basketball, what would it be?

Getty Images
source: Getty Images
Ethan Miller/Getty Images


If you were put in charge of college basketball, what’s one on-court rule that you would change/add and why?

MORE: Read through all the Burning Questions here

Rob Dauster: Man, where do I even start? First of all, let’s make it a 30-second shot clock. There’s no reason that men’s college basketball should be different from every other level of the sport. That’s foolish. Next, I’d move the charge circle out farther from the rim and go back to the rules that we had last season. Allowing a defender to slide underneath a player that’s in the air to take a charge is a scourge on our game. The next thing I’d do is limit the TV timeouts. There are NINE TV timeouts during a college basketball game, which is about five too many. It destroys the flow of games. We’re approaching the NFL’s extra point-commercial-kickoff-commercial ridiculousness.

That whole you can pump fake and jump into a player that’s already in the air to draw a foul move? Gone. Flagrant fouls for unintentional elbows? Gone. (I understand the need to protect players, but if you don’t want to get bowed in the face, don’t stick your face into a defender’s chest.) Extended reviews for anything? No. I’d also prevent coaches from being able to gather their team during reviews. No huddles.

Raphielle Johnson: Give me a 30-second shot clock, and that isn’t about the thought that such a move would automatically speed up the game either because that’s not a given. Women’s college basketball uses the 30-second clock, and FIBA amateur competitions use a 24-second clock. College basketball can’t just shave off five seconds? I find it to be a joke personally, so drop down to 30 seconds across the board. And I’m not buying the excuse that it will be “difficult” for players to adjust either. They, and the coaches entrusted with the task of teaching them, will adjust.

Scott Phillips: Too many timeouts. It’s one of the biggest complaints I hear about college basketball. During televised games we now have to sit through eight TV timeouts and each team also has five timeouts of their own. The first team timeout in the second half also turns into a fifth TV timeout in the second half. Great, more commercials…

That means a ridiculous 18 potential stoppages per game for coaches to draw up plays in a 40-minute period. That’s way too much.

I understand the need to generate revenue and it’s silly to ask for a change with that, but why not reduce the number of timeouts that coaches can use so that we speed up games and reduce stoppages?

Make coaches prepare their players more before games or have them figure out another way to convey things with them, but let’s eliminate so many stoppages that are killing the flow of the game.

Terrence Payne: I was originally going to go with changing the 35-second shot clock. To me it makes no sense why it’s the longest in organized basketball (even longer than states that use shot clocks in high school), but seeing as it’s been touched on above, let’s go with the “hanging on the rim” technical. Look I get it, those plays happen in real time and officials instinctually blow the whistle and asses the technical. But in most cases players are racing down the floor with their weight carrying them forward. Holding onto the rim is a protective measure from what could be a serious injury. Need a reference on this: watch Kendall Pollard’s technical in the first half of the Dayton-UConn game Friday afternoon.

NCAA announces proposed change to block/charge call

1 Comment

The block/charge rule is something that has irked many over the years, with fans, players and coaches alike voicing their displeasure with calls made by officials. The men’s basketball championship committee sought to provide some clarity last summer, with a secondary defender required to be set before the offensive player went into an upward motion in order to draw a charge.

But with that change came more confusion than clarity, and to be fair that will be the case regardless of what changes are made due to the fact that such calls depend upon the official’s viewpoint. Friday afternoon the NCAA announced that a defender will now have to be in “legal guarding position before the airborne player leaves the floor to pass or shoot.”

“This alteration will impact block/charge plays in an effort to make this play easier to coach and officiate,” said Rick Byrd, head coach at Belmont University and chair of the committee, which met jointly with the National Association of Basketball Coaches board of directors and the Division I Men’s Basketball Championship Committee. “In our discussions, the men’s basketball community, including coaches, officials and administrators, agreed that this rule needed adjustment.”

So would it be fair to argue that the NCAA will bring back the original rule, provided the measure is approved on June 25? That sure seems to be the case. But while this is the most notable proposed change it isn’t the only one, as the committee has proposed the expansion of the restricted area around the basket (where a charge cannot be drawn) from three to four feet.

Other proposed changes focus on areas such as when officials can go to the monitor for a shot clock review and television timeout procedures when a team timeout is taken with 30 seconds of the next media stoppage.