CBT Roundtable: Game’s on the line, who do you want with the ball?

Leave a comment

source:

At this point in the season, Doug McDermott is the clear favorite for National Player of Year and, in the eyes of most observers, the guy that everyone would want taking a shot with the game on the line. That’s exactly what happened last week, when Greg McDermott drew up the Bill Self’s famous ‘Chop’ play, getting Doug a wide-open look from 24-feet for a game-winner.

Would you believe that was just the second game-winner McDermott’s ever hit in his life?

If you could pick one player in the country to have the ball in their hands, down one on the final possession, would it be Dougie McBuckets?

Raphielle Johnson: Doug is not a bad choice at all, but I do notice that you did not specify that the player has to shoot the ball. For a shooter, BYU’s Tyler Haws would be another possibility for me. But here’s a name for you: San Diego State’s Xavier Thames.

Why?

As we saw last night, he’s capable of making the right decision in late-game situations whether it’s as a shooter or passer. And given his skill set, he isn’t a player who will wait too long and end up being forced to hoist up a challenged shot. And as I noted earlier, despite this desire for “hero ball” and demanding that guys shoot regardless there’s a need to be able to make the RIGHT basketball play.

Rob Dauster: There’s no doubt that McDermott is the best scorer in the country right now. He’s the prototype when it comes to high-usage, high-efficiency scoring. That said, McDermott’s strength isn’t his ability to beat people one-on-one. He does the majority of his damage because he understands angles and how to get himself open.

source:
AP photo

I would want the ball in the hands of Shabazz Napier. He’s an excellent shooter off the dribble and as good as anyone in the country at creating space for himself to get off a jumper when he’s isolated. He’s also proven time and time again that he has the, ahem, intestinal fortitude to take and make big shots in big moments.

Kevin Doyle: It’s hard to argue against McBuckets at this point as he’s the best offensive player in the country by far. He’s as cool and as smooth as they come. McDermott seemingly never forces anything on offense, is able to get off a shot in a variety of ways — important if he has the ball in his hands for the final possession — and his ridiculous shooting percentages across the board speak for themselves. Let it be known that I would want McDermott taking the shot in the final possession, but I’ll take the contrarian perspective to stir the pot.

Connecticut’s Shabazz Napier has a knack for the heroics. He single-handedly beat Indiana earlier this season, scoring eight of the Huskies’ final 11 points. Napier followed that up by hitting perhaps the shot of the season against Florida, to beat the Gators 65-64 at the buzzer. As Napier goes, the Huskies go. Unlike McDermott, Napier is more apt to find a way to the basket off the dribble if a jump-shot isn’t there.

Terrence Payne: You can’t go wrong with Doug McDermott with the game in the balance. Even though St. John’s lost track of him, leaving him wide-open McDermott was the reason Creighton had such a big lead, scoring 62 percent of his teams points. But I wouldn’t say he’s the definitive best option with the game on the line.

This question isn’t about who you would want to take the final shot, merely who do you want to have the ball.

I’ll go with Syracuse’s Tyler Ennis. He’s always poised with the rock and he’s been great in games against Duke, made key plays in a win against Pittsburgh and despite struggling at times in the second half against St. John’s, made critical plays down the stretch. Surround him with weapons like Trevor Cooney (when he’s making shots), C.J. Fair and Jerami Grant, I like my chances with Ennis running the show in a late-game situation.

Scott Phillips: Given Doug McDermott’s size, ability to make shots and savvy, I would trust him with the ball in his hands more than any college player in the country down by one point on the final possession. McDermott is a matchup nightmare at the college level because he can hit shots from anywhere on the floor while also working the mid-post and getting to the free throw line. He’d also be intelligent and able enough pass out of it and his Creighton teammates would know how to respond. I’d put it in his hands every time.

Illinois lands important commitment from four-star Class of 2017 guard Mark Smith

2 Comments

Illinois landed a very important Class of 2017 commitment on Wednesday as guard Mark Smith pledged to the Illini.

The 6-foot-4 Smith was previously a Missouri commit for baseball, but some issues with his arm caused him to look back into basketball last summer. A native of Edwardsville, in the St. Louis metro area, Smith came out of nowhere to win the Illinois Mr. Basketball award as a senior this season as he averaged 21.9 points, 8.4 assists and 8.2 rebounds while becoming a consensus national top-100 prospect.

Rivals rates Smith as the No. 52 overall prospect in the Class of 2017 as he could come in and earn immediate minutes at Illinois next season at either guard spot.

This is a very important commitment for head coach Brad Underwood and the Illini as the new head coach was able to hold off some elite programs like Kentucky and Michigan State for Smith’s services.

Northwestern gets commitment from Boston College transfer A.J. Turner

(Photo by Grant Halverson/Getty Images)
Leave a comment

Northwestern landed a transfer on Wednesday as former Boston College wing A.J. Turner pledged to the Wildcats, a source confirmed to NBCSports.com.

The 6-foot-7 Turner just finished his sophomore season with the Golden Eagles as he averaged 8.4 points, 3.3 rebounds and 3.0 assists per game. A well-rounded wing who also shot 37 percent from three-point range, Turner will have to sit out one season due to NCAA transfer regulations before getting two more years of eligibility.

With Scottie Lindsay and Vic Law only having limited time left in Evanston, Turner provides a bit of insurance on the wing for the Wildcats for the future as he’s a proven rotation player coming from the ACC.

Oakland’s Greg Kampe hosting charity golf event with big-name coaches

(Photo by Rey Del Rio/Getty Images)
Leave a comment

Oakland head coach Greg Kampe hosted a successful charity event for cancer research two years ago by allowing people to bid online to play a round of golf with some of college basketball’s best coaches.

Kampe is back again this year as he’s hoping to eventually raise $1 million for the American Cancer Society.

According to a report from Mark Snyder of the Detroit Free Press, Kampe has 11 high-profile names that fans can play with this year.

  • Tom Izzo, Michigan State
  • Frank Martin, South Carolina
  • Rick Barnes, Tennessee
  • Mick Cronin, Cincinnati
  • Chris Holtmann, Butler
  • Kevin Willard, Seton Hall
  • Greg Kampe, Oakland
  • Stan Van Gundy, Detroit Pistons
  • Steve Lavin
  • Fran Fraschilla
  • Bill Raftery

Fans can find more details about the auctions and all of the details here.

The minimum bid is $15,000 per coach. A “buy now” bid of $24,000 is also available.

Each round includes the following, according to the event’s website:

Up for auction will be 11 spectacular packages, featuring a private dinner with elite basketball coaches and VIPs, a one night stay at MotorCity Casino Hotel on Sunday, June 4, and an afternoon of golf on Monday, June 5 at Oakland Hills Country Club on the South Course. The winning bidders and their two guests will round out the foursomes with their selected VIP: Rick Barnes, Mick Cronin, Fran Fraschilla, Chris Holtmann, Tom Izzo, Greg Kampe, Steve Lavin, Frank Martin, Bill Raftery, Stan Van Gundy, or Kevin Willard.

There are a lot of great selections to choose from for this sort of thing, but I can’t imagine a better afternoon than playing golf with Bill Raftery and a few friends. There are some other tempting choices on this list, but that’s the one I would have to jump at.

If you think 137 players declaring for the draft is stupid, you’re probably stupid

Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
4 Comments

The NBA Draft’s full early entry list came out on Tuesday afternoon, and there were 137 underclassmen listed on it.

137.

For 60 spots in the NBA Draft, only 30 of which guarantee you a contract in the NBA.

And that’s before you factor in the 45 international players that also declared for the NBA Draft, as well as the crop of seniors — Josh Hart, Monte’ Morris, Jaron Blossomgame, Alec Peters — that are going to end up hearing their names called. All told, there are going to be roughly 200 players competing to be one of the 60 people that end up getting drafted on June 22nd, and you don’t have to be any good at math to realize that 200 is a much, much bigger number than 60.

This unleashed a torrent of bad takes on the decision of these players.

And bad may not be doing those takes justice.

Because the bottom-line is this: You cannot paint the decision on whether or not to go pro with a broad brush.

For some players, making money of any kind is something they need to do to support their family, whether it’s what they’ll get with a first round guarantee, the $75-100,000 they’ll get for making a training camp roster to subsidize their time in the D-League while teams develop them or the money they can make in the D-League or overseas. You don’t know what their financial situation is. Maximizing their ability to capitalize on every available dollar they can make off of their athletic gifts may be more important than working towards a degree.

And it’s worth noting here that a guaranteed contract isn’t the only way to make a living in professional basketball. To say nothing of the money that can be made overseas or the number of second round picks and undrafted players that make guaranteed money — which is more than you probably realize — it needs to be noted that D-League salaries are getting a bump this year with the new CBA.

The NBA has also instituted something new called a “two-way contract”. Without getting into the legalese, it’s essentially a retainer worth well into the six figures that they will be able to give to two players that will allow them to retain that player under contract while sending them between the D-League and the NBA roster. In a sense, it creates an extra 60 NBA roster spots for players that have 0-3 years worth of professional basketball on their résumé.

Some players are simply declaring without signing with an agent because they want to get feedback directly from NBA personnel on what their professional prospects. Some will hear that they need to return to school to work on their body, or work on their jumper, or mature as a person to be able to handle everything that comes with being a professional. Others will be told they’re going to make a lot of money by staying in the draft, or that they need to go back to school because, frankly, they are not professional basketball players. Not getting invited to the NBA combine is a pretty good indication of where you stand in the eyes of NBA teams.

Still other players are putting their name into the draft to leave their options open should they be recruited over by the program they are a part of. Take Frank Jackson, for example. If he can return to school and thrive as Duke’s point guard, maybe he turns into a top 20 pick. But what happens if Trevon Duval, the best point guard in the Class of 2017 and a top five pick in the 2018 NBA Draft, picks Duke? Would it be in Jackson’s best interest to come back to Duke when he won’t be playing the position that he needs to learn to play to turn himself into a lasting NBA player?

Jackson, like the roughly 100 underclassmen that have declared without an agent, has until May 24th to make his decision on whether or not he will keep his name in the draft. Until then, he can return to school without damaging his eligibility.

The entire reason that the NCAA changed their rules to allow players to test the waters is so that they can make the most important decision of their lives with as much information as humanly possible. This thing exists for the sole purpose of allowing the kids to have as much knowledge about their options as possible.

And that is exactly what these kids are doing.

So the idea that this rule, or players taking advantage of that rule, however high that number may be, is a bad thing is stupid.