Reggie Bullock

UVA cools Heels, wins ACC opener

1 Comment

Charlottesville — The Tar Heels are used to moving fast. They came into John Paul Jones arena as an unsurprising No. 1 in the nation in adjusted tempo. Virginia, on the other hand, was 343rd in the same stat. It was a classic unstoppable force vs. immovable object kind of game. The game ended up in the realm of 61 possessions for both teams, and that made it Virginia’s type of game. One of the NBA scouts in attendance — I’ll call him Jim Cardaway — seemed visibly annoyed with the frequent stagnation of the UNC offense.

When the final buzzer sounded, the Cavaliers held sway, winning 61-52 to take their ACC opener. The score represented Carolina’s season low on offense.

Most young teams make mistakes when they start moving too fast. For the UNC Tar Heels, the reverse almost seems to be true. Give a Heel time to think about what he’s doing on offense these days, and he’s likely to travel, hesitate a moment too long and let the lane close or miss his wide-open pivot man.

“In a physical game, it’s hard to get out and run as much,” said UVA head coach Tony Bennett. “But we tried to be vigilant and make them play against the set defense.”

Both teams were bolstered by the return of valued players. Reggie Bullock made a flashy comeback for the Heels, scoring 22 points on 7-9 shooting. UVA’s returnee was quieter, but no less important. Jontel Evans, back after sitting the last nine games for the Cavaliers, tallied just eight points, but his presence meant a lot to his team.

“It helped a lot,”  said UVA head coach Tony Bennett. “He’s not where he needs to be defensively, but as an older guy he was able to body Paige a few times.”

Virginia’s offensive spark came from 6’5″ swingman Joe Harris, who was the only Cavalier in double figures. He dropped 19 points on 7-11 shooting, including 2-4 from deep.

UNC’s freshman point guard Marcus Paige admitted after the game that UVA’s persistent, jarring screens threw the Tar Heels off their rhythm. Paige’s clear-headed analysis of his team’s flaws was echoed by his head coach, who assessed the game in terms only Roy Williams can, or will, use:

“Just silliness,” said a disgusted Williams in the post-game press conference. “You can’t say you’re young any more. It was a breakdown on both ends of the court. ACC basketball on the road and all that are great excuses, but we just didn’t frickin’ play.”

Eric Angevine is the editor of Storming the Floor. He tweets @stfhoops.

Nigel Hayes’ comment on basketball brands hits on greater point

Wisconsin's Nigel Hayes (10) drives on Ohio State's Jae'Sean Tate (1) during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016, in Madison, Wis. Hayes had a team-high 21 points in Wisconsin's 79-68 win. (AP Photo/Andy Manis)
AP Photo/Andy Manis
Leave a comment

Much is made about the ball when it comes to how the sport of basketball is played and rightfully so, as the ball is the most important piece of equipment. Different brands have different characteristics, and with college basketball programs being able to pick the ball they use for home games there are adjustments to be made during the season.

Wisconsin will play at No. 2 Maryland Saturday, meaning that in the days leading up to the game the Badgers needed to get used to the Under Armour basketball. The brand became a conversation point in the aftermath of Maryland’s win over No. 4 Iowa last month, with the Hawkeyes (while not blaming the ball for their loss) made note of the differences between the Under Armour ball and the Nike ball they use for their home games.

Thursday Wisconsin forward Nigel Hayes offered up his observations on the basketball while also pointing out (albeit sarcastically) the goal of intercollegiate athletics.

“It’s definitely different,” Hayes said. “Personally, we don’t like it too much. I don’t like the Under Armour ball whatsoever. But that’s the way this amateur sports league is set up. We’re supposed to be having fun, but all the money is in these basketballs that colleges play with. But it’s an amateur sport, we’re just here for fun. It’s not really that serious. So I guess any ball should be OK.

“Maybe we should have a universal ball like the NBA. You don’t go to the Clippers’ stadium and play with a Nike and then go to Golden State and play with a Rawlings. But in this amateur sport of college, where money isn’t the goal — it’s the student education and experience that you get — we play with a million different basketballs.”

Hayes makes a good point here, and in regards to the NBA all hell would break loose under similar circumstances (remember the leather vs. microfiber composite controversy in 2006?). If these games are solely about fun and the college experience, wouldn’t having one ball used by all schools better fit that mission? This isn’t the biggest of deals when it comes to “amateur” athletics, as different basketball brands have been used for years.

But Hayes was able to take this situation and work it into the discussion of the goals of intercollegiate athletics. Is it about the experience? Or does the ability to profit, be it through a minor move such as using a particular ball or the more impactful step of moving from one conference to another, take precedence? Given the shifts that have occurred in college sports in recent years, it’s quite apparent that the search for additional revenue streams has won out.

Hayes did note that neither he nor his teammates would make excuses, saying that the team would simple “have to get used to” the unfamiliar basketball according to the Wisconsin State Journal. In the end, this was a good use of sarcasm by Hayes to make a greater point about the collegiate athletics machine he and his teammates are but minor parts of.

Marquette fan sends Providence money for missed free throw

Providence's Kris Dunn reacts to his shot during the first half of an NCAA basketball game against Villanova, Sunday, Jan. 24, 2016, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Chris Szagola)
AP Photo/Chris Szagola
Leave a comment

It goes without saying that sports can inspire some interesting promises, from players and coaches guaranteeing victory to fans making statements that hinge on the outcome of a particular game or play (see: tattoos celebrating a team’s triumphs before they’ve even won the game in question). For one Marquette fan, the need for Providence’s Kris Dunn to miss a free throw during Wednesday night’s game (which Marquette won in overtime) inspired him to make a promise that he intended to keep.

Jamey Schilling took the approach of yelling that he’d pay Dunn $10 if he missed the free throw. Sure enough Dunn missed the shot, and Schilling made good on his promise. But with players themselves unable to receive such funds due to NCAA rules, Schilling sent the check to the Providence athletic department.

Schilling’s gesture did not go unnoticed by Marquette either, as the school sent him a gift card to use in the Marquette Spirit Shop.

H/T For The Win