Adreian Payne, Jacob Pettway

Division I teams: Stop the cupcakes in December


Scrolling through tonight’s Division I college basketball slate, I noticed something. Well, I’ve been noticing it for some time now.

I looked at the schedule and found certain, we’ll call them ‘unique’, match-ups. Ones I haven’t recalled ever seeing in mid-December. So I looked some of them up. These schools don’t reside in Division I, at least not in the NCAA.

SIU-Edwardsville is playing Eureka College, who has also played Texas-Pan American already this season. Northern Colorado? They get mighty Tabor College tonight. Bethune-Cookman has a date with Florida Christian. And given the name and my adolescent history with religious-type girls, they won’t get very far (off-the-court, at least).

Division I programs playing non-Division I teams well into the season. It’s a recent trend in Division I college basketball, and it needs to stop. Yesterday.

I get it. They’re easy wins. Everyone likes to look in the newspaper or on a website and see a 30-or-40-point blowout win. It’s a great confidence booster. But, for the love of God, think about when you get these victories. Ones like this are reserved for the exhibition slate.

I did some research. For the sake of time, I looked through only the past week to identify how many teams played a game against a non-Division I team in the past week. If anything, I thought it would fight my case. It didn’t. By my count, there have been 25 contests out of a possible 212 since last Monday. That’s 25 no-win games for 25 teams. A vast majority of them played by mid-or-low major Division I teams.

I say no-win because frankly, no one wins with a blowout victory against a team that has no shot at winning. The only result that could matter? A loss. Ask Charleston how they feel about that game to Anderson (S.C.) University last week, 65-49. Yep, a loss.

I get it, okay? When you’re a program that isn’t necessarily big-time, you take the W’s you can get. And in turn, the opponents who don’t (normally) stand a chance take a nice, hearty game check and use it towards expenses and other athletic or university-centric endeavors. That’s fine. But do it in the beginning of the season. Wins like that at this point don’t help anything. Not your RPI, your seeding in your conference tournament and most certainly don’t lend a hand to your postseason hopes.

It’s better to at least be bold enough to try for a game in that slot that could do some good towards those postseason aspirations. A game against a team of equal talent, from a conference on-par with their own.

By mid-December, all teams in Division I should know what kind of team they have, so the “we’re still figuring ourselves out” excuse is a waste of time. And pounding Po-Dunk State from NAIA Division II isn’t going to help that. Confidence is one thing. Confidence in a game that shouldn’t be in doubt, that’s another. That just equals ego.

To the small schools taking their beatings. By all means, collect your game checks. This isn’t about you.

To the teams in the SWAC, MEAC, Big South, Sun Belt, Atlantic Sun and beyond: I understand that there aren’t many options when it comes to playing tune-up games that can build your team’s confidence. But instead of fishing for easy wins, play one another in the non-conference. A loss may be a result, but, in my opinion, there’s at least something to be learned. Nothing can be learned by smashing a non-D-1 this far into the season.

Admittedly, there’s no correlation between teams having late-season success or failure and playing cupcakes well into their seasons. That’s fine. College football teams schedule Football Championship Subdivision teams for Senior Day — or just for the hell of it — to get a win, so it’s not like this is a problem that affects only college basketball. But be better than that, Division I. Because you are, the scoreboard normally proves it.

David Harten is a sportswriter and college basketball blogger, you can follow him on Twitter at @David_Harten.

Former Wichita State assistant returns as a consultant

Chris Jans, Gregg Marshall
Associated Press
1 Comment

Prior to a one-year stint as the head coach coach at Bowling Green that came to an end in early April as a result of an incident at a Bowling Green restaurant, Chris Jans was a member of Gregg Marshall’s coaching staff at Wichita State from 2007-14. During those seven seasons Jans was a key figure as the Shockers made the progression to a respected national power.

Jans is back in Wichita, with Paul Suellentrop of the Wichita Eagle reporting Thursday that he’s serving as a consultant to the program. Jans’ consulting agreement runs for 45 days, which the school can renew, and he’ll be paid $10,000 for the work. While Jans isn’t allowed to do any coaching, he can watch practices and provide Marshall and the coaching staff with his observations.

“He will be able to consult with the coaching staff, only on what he observes in practice,” said Darron Boatright, WSU deputy athletics director. “By NCAA rule, a consultant is not allowed to have communication with student-athletes … not about basketball-related activities or performance.”

While Jans (who according to the story has served in a similar role for another school) can’t do any coaching in this role, his return does give Marshall another trusted voice to call upon when needed. Wichita State bid farewell to an assistant coach this spring with Steve Forbes being hired as the head coach at East Tennessee State, with his position being filled by former Sunrise Christian Academy coach Kyle Lindsted.


AUDIO: Rick Pitino discusses allegations, future at Louisville

Rick Pitino
Associated Press
Leave a comment

Thursday afternoon marked the first time since Friday that Louisville head coach Rick Pitino commented on the controversy that has taken his program by storm. Speaking with Terry Meiners of 840 WHAS in Louisville, Pitino discussed the escort scandal, what could have possibly led former staffer Andre McGee down the path he’s alleged to have taken in Katina Powell’s book and his future at Louisville.

The interview began with Meiners asking Pitino if it changed his thinking as to whether or not he needed to resign, which (as one would expect) Pitino shot down. Also discussed was the statement released by school president Dr. James Ramsey, which expressed support for athletic director Tom Jurich but did not mention Pitino at all.

“Well I can’t answer that, Terry,” Pitino said when asked why he wasn’t mentioned in the statement. “Twenty-six years ago Kentucky brought me in to make the program compliant to NCAA rules. (Then-Kentucky president) Dr. (David) Roselle and (then Kentucky athletic director) C.M. Newton thought I was the guy to come in and change around the images, change around the culture and add a lot of discipline to the program. And I did that.

“And then I came here to the University of Louisville, and if someone was five seconds late or not early consequences would be paid from a disciplinary standpoint,” Pitino continued. “This is obviously not a person being late, this is not about a person (not) working hard. This is about things that are very disgusting, things that turn my stomach, things that keep me up without sleeping.

“But unfortunately, I had no knowledge of any of this and don’t believe in it. It’s sickening to me, the whole thing. But I’m thinking of my 13 players, I’m thinking of our program, and I’m sorry that Dr. Ramsey did not think enough to mention me but that’s something I cannot control.”

Below is audio of the full interview, which ran just over 17 minutes in length.