Baylor Bears head coach Scott Drew directs his team against the Kentucky Wildcats during the first half of their men's NCAA South Regional basketball game in Atlanta

Baylor fans should be ecstatic about timing of ESPN’s report


On Monday afternoon, Trent Johnson was formally introduced as the head coach at TCU, which made official something that we had expected for nearly a week.

A few hours earlier, had published a report from Jason King that Baylor’s men’s basketball program could be facing possible NCAA sanctions stemming from a 29-month investigation. The sanctions are the result of more than 1,200 impermissible phone calls and text messages that were sent by both the men’s team, which is coming off of their second Elite Eight in three seasons, and the women’s team, which was led to a 40-0 record and a national title by Player of the Year Britney Griner.

The details of the investigation’s findings are, for the most part, irrelevant. When you recruit at the level that Scott Drew does and the NCAA investigates your program for 29 months and only comes up with impermissible phone calls — a rule that has since been changed; there are no more contact restrictions — than you are doing something right. Baylor’s already instituted a number of self-imposed slaps on the wrist and may end up getting a few more from the NCAA. Whoop-dee-doo.

What’s much more interesting is the timing of this report being leaked.

You see, Trent Johnson’s decision to take the head coaching position at TCU opened up the same job at LSU. One of the names that keeps coming up as Johnson’s replacement? Scott Drew. Is LSU going to hire a coach days after news breaks of a recruiting scandal he was involved in? Are they willing to make that leap when the overwhelming sentiment was “that’s all you got?”

It begs the question: where did Jason King get this scoop? Did Baylor leak this story in an effort to try and keep their head coach?

And here’s where the irony begins. Baylor fans are fired up about the findings. They are mad that they will get in trouble for rules that are no longer in place, they are mad that this will only further sully the reputation of their head coach and they are mad that their program will continue to be considered “cheaters”. What they don’t realize, however, is that this report may be the reason that their head coach remains their head coach.

Think about like this: In early April of 2009, John Calipari left Memphis to take over at Kentucky. He’s since led the Wildcats to an Elite Eight, a Final Four and the national title. Memphis replaced him with Josh Pastner, who missed the NCAA tournament in 2010 and failed to get out of the first round in 2011 and 2012 despite having a roster stocked with talent. In late May of 2009, the news that Derrick Rose may have cheated on his SATs and that Memphis could have their 2007-2008 season — the year in which they made a run to the national title game — erased from the record books finally broke.

If the folks at Memphis had leaked that news two months earlier, would Kentucky still have come calling for Calipari?

And don’t underestimate the importance of Scott Drew to Baylor. The reason that Johnson was able to take the TCU job is that it was opened up when Jim Christian went to Ohio. In other words, based on the movement of the coaches, Ohio is better than TCU, which is better than LSU. And Scott Drew wants the LSU job?

Jason King’s inbox should be filled with thank you notes by the end of the day.

Rob Dauster is the editor of the college basketball website Ballin’ is a Habit. You can find him on twitter @robdauster.

Tom Izzo’s point is valid, but he’s wrong about the new fouling rules

Eron Harris, Tom Izzo
AP Photo/Jae C. Hong
Leave a comment

On Sunday night, after No. 3 Michigan State knocked off No. 23 Providence in the final of the Wooden Legacy, Spartans head coach Tom Izzo made sure to make his feelings known about the new college basketball officiating mandates.

He doesn’t like them.

At all.

“I just think we’re taking the flow of the game away,” Izzo said. “Maybe it’ll change. We’ll play by the same rules everybody else does. But I think I can voice my opinion to say that I don’t agree with it.”

Part of what frustrated Izzo was that, in a matchup between the two best players in college basketball, both Denzel Valentine and Kris Dunn were sent to the bench with foul trouble.

“I didn’t like it either way,” Izzo said. “I didn’t like having Denzel on the bench, and I didn’t even like watching Dunn on the bench.”

“Don’t tweet this now and leave out the officials,” he added, according to “It’s not their fault. Because that’s the way they’re mandated to call them. So I am really either blaming the rules committee, which ends up on the coaches somewhat. So I’m looking in the mirror and blaming myself because I should have argued it more maybe. I just don’t think it’s fun to have these guys sitting.”

This is nothing new for Izzo. This was calculated. He basically said the same thing after Michigan State, then No. 1 in the country, beat Oklahoma in the Coaches vs. Cancer Classic two seasons ago, when the rules committee tried to implement these same rules. It was his pushback that started the campaign to get rid of the freedom of movement rules.

But here’s the thing: we all knew this was going to happen. We knew there was going to be an adjustment period, for coaches and players and referees alike. In the long run, freedom of movement is good for basketball. It’s part of the reason the NBA is so much fun to watch these days, as their emphasis on the freedom of movement got us out of the days where the Detroit Pistons were winning titles without scoring 80 points.

Physicality is ingrained in college basketball. Coaches teach defense a certain way. Players play defense a certain way. The guys in the NBA are stronger, but the style of play is much more physical in the college game than the pro game. That doesn’t change overnight.

It changes when those rules are enforced and those fouls are called, and, as a result, the players and coaches learn to adjust to them.

Kennesaw State blows eight-point lead in 16 seconds, loses to Elon

Elon Athletics
Leave a comment

Kennesaw State entered Monday night at 1-6 on the season, but with 19 seconds left, it looked like the Owls have their second of the season locked up. Kendrick Ray made a pair of free throws with 19 seconds left to put KSU up 89-81, and all they had to do was avoid a complete meltdown to get out with a win.

They couldn’t.

A Luke Eddy layup with 16 seconds left cut the lead to six, and after KSU’s Nigel Pruitt missed two free throws, Dainan Swoope his a three with seven seconds left to make the score 89-86.

On the ensuing inbounds, Kennesaw State threw the ball away … and then proceeded to foul Eddy when he was shooting a three. This is what that disaster looked like:

Eddy would hit all three threes before, shockingly, KSU turned the ball over again. Elon could not capitalize this time, sending the game to overtime, where the Phoenix outscored the Owls 14-4.

Elon won 104-94.

Here’s what the comeback looked like on the play-by-play:

Screen Shot 2015-12-01 at 7.39.27 AM