Baylor Bears head coach Scott Drew directs his team against the Kentucky Wildcats during the first half of their men's NCAA South Regional basketball game in Atlanta

Baylor fans should be ecstatic about timing of ESPN’s report

4 Comments

On Monday afternoon, Trent Johnson was formally introduced as the head coach at TCU, which made official something that we had expected for nearly a week.

A few hours earlier, ESPN.com had published a report from Jason King that Baylor’s men’s basketball program could be facing possible NCAA sanctions stemming from a 29-month investigation. The sanctions are the result of more than 1,200 impermissible phone calls and text messages that were sent by both the men’s team, which is coming off of their second Elite Eight in three seasons, and the women’s team, which was led to a 40-0 record and a national title by Player of the Year Britney Griner.

The details of the investigation’s findings are, for the most part, irrelevant. When you recruit at the level that Scott Drew does and the NCAA investigates your program for 29 months and only comes up with impermissible phone calls — a rule that has since been changed; there are no more contact restrictions — than you are doing something right. Baylor’s already instituted a number of self-imposed slaps on the wrist and may end up getting a few more from the NCAA. Whoop-dee-doo.

What’s much more interesting is the timing of this report being leaked.

You see, Trent Johnson’s decision to take the head coaching position at TCU opened up the same job at LSU. One of the names that keeps coming up as Johnson’s replacement? Scott Drew. Is LSU going to hire a coach days after news breaks of a recruiting scandal he was involved in? Are they willing to make that leap when the overwhelming sentiment was “that’s all you got?”

It begs the question: where did Jason King get this scoop? Did Baylor leak this story in an effort to try and keep their head coach?

And here’s where the irony begins. Baylor fans are fired up about the findings. They are mad that they will get in trouble for rules that are no longer in place, they are mad that this will only further sully the reputation of their head coach and they are mad that their program will continue to be considered “cheaters”. What they don’t realize, however, is that this report may be the reason that their head coach remains their head coach.

Think about like this: In early April of 2009, John Calipari left Memphis to take over at Kentucky. He’s since led the Wildcats to an Elite Eight, a Final Four and the national title. Memphis replaced him with Josh Pastner, who missed the NCAA tournament in 2010 and failed to get out of the first round in 2011 and 2012 despite having a roster stocked with talent. In late May of 2009, the news that Derrick Rose may have cheated on his SATs and that Memphis could have their 2007-2008 season — the year in which they made a run to the national title game — erased from the record books finally broke.

If the folks at Memphis had leaked that news two months earlier, would Kentucky still have come calling for Calipari?

And don’t underestimate the importance of Scott Drew to Baylor. The reason that Johnson was able to take the TCU job is that it was opened up when Jim Christian went to Ohio. In other words, based on the movement of the coaches, Ohio is better than TCU, which is better than LSU. And Scott Drew wants the LSU job?

Jason King’s inbox should be filled with thank you notes by the end of the day.

Rob Dauster is the editor of the college basketball website Ballin’ is a Habit. You can find him on twitter @robdauster.

Nigel Hayes’ comment on basketball brands hits on greater point

Wisconsin's Nigel Hayes (10) drives on Ohio State's Jae'Sean Tate (1) during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016, in Madison, Wis. Hayes had a team-high 21 points in Wisconsin's 79-68 win. (AP Photo/Andy Manis)
AP Photo/Andy Manis
Leave a comment

Much is made about the ball when it comes to how the sport of basketball is played and rightfully so, as the ball is the most important piece of equipment. Different brands have different characteristics, and with college basketball programs being able to pick the ball they use for home games there are adjustments to be made during the season.

Wisconsin will play at No. 2 Maryland Saturday, meaning that in the days leading up to the game the Badgers needed to get used to the Under Armour basketball. The brand became a conversation point in the aftermath of Maryland’s win over No. 4 Iowa last month, with the Hawkeyes (while not blaming the ball for their loss) made note of the differences between the Under Armour ball and the Nike ball they use for their home games.

Thursday Wisconsin forward Nigel Hayes offered up his observations on the basketball while also pointing out (albeit sarcastically) the goal of intercollegiate athletics.

“It’s definitely different,” Hayes said. “Personally, we don’t like it too much. I don’t like the Under Armour ball whatsoever. But that’s the way this amateur sports league is set up. We’re supposed to be having fun, but all the money is in these basketballs that colleges play with. But it’s an amateur sport, we’re just here for fun. It’s not really that serious. So I guess any ball should be OK.

“Maybe we should have a universal ball like the NBA. You don’t go to the Clippers’ stadium and play with a Nike and then go to Golden State and play with a Rawlings. But in this amateur sport of college, where money isn’t the goal — it’s the student education and experience that you get — we play with a million different basketballs.”

Hayes makes a good point here, and in regards to the NBA all hell would break loose under similar circumstances (remember the leather vs. microfiber composite controversy in 2006?). If these games are solely about fun and the college experience, wouldn’t having one ball used by all schools better fit that mission? This isn’t the biggest of deals when it comes to “amateur” athletics, as different basketball brands have been used for years.

But Hayes was able to take this situation and work it into the discussion of the goals of intercollegiate athletics. Is it about the experience? Or does the ability to profit, be it through a minor move such as using a particular ball or the more impactful step of moving from one conference to another, take precedence? Given the shifts that have occurred in college sports in recent years, it’s quite apparent that the search for additional revenue streams has won out.

Hayes did note that neither he nor his teammates would make excuses, saying that the team would simple “have to get used to” the unfamiliar basketball according to the Wisconsin State Journal. In the end, this was a good use of sarcasm by Hayes to make a greater point about the collegiate athletics machine he and his teammates are but minor parts of.

Marquette fan sends Providence money for missed free throw

Providence's Kris Dunn reacts to his shot during the first half of an NCAA basketball game against Villanova, Sunday, Jan. 24, 2016, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Chris Szagola)
AP Photo/Chris Szagola
Leave a comment

It goes without saying that sports can inspire some interesting promises, from players and coaches guaranteeing victory to fans making statements that hinge on the outcome of a particular game or play (see: tattoos celebrating a team’s triumphs before they’ve even won the game in question). For one Marquette fan, the need for Providence’s Kris Dunn to miss a free throw during Wednesday night’s game (which Marquette won in overtime) inspired him to make a promise that he intended to keep.

Jamey Schilling took the approach of yelling that he’d pay Dunn $10 if he missed the free throw. Sure enough Dunn missed the shot, and Schilling made good on his promise. But with players themselves unable to receive such funds due to NCAA rules, Schilling sent the check to the Providence athletic department.

Schilling’s gesture did not go unnoticed by Marquette either, as the school sent him a gift card to use in the Marquette Spirit Shop.

H/T For The Win